arXiv rate-limits submissions, citing an AI-driven flood of low-quality papers
2026-10-05
arXiv announced it will limit researchers to two submissions per calendar month and three active submissions at a time, citing an overwhelmed volunteer moderation team. arXiv said September 2026 submissions reached 40,363, up from 20,569 in September 2024 and 9,869 in September 2016 — doubling in two years and sextupling in the computer science category. Editorial advisory council chair Thomas Dietterich said the change targets 'thin papers of narrow scope,' 'salami' papers, and 'dense, AI-written papers.'
Significance 3: A concrete, quantified sign of AI-driven strain on research-publishing infrastructure is a meaningful adoption-outcomes/org-culture data point, though it affects a research-ecosystem institution rather than a tracked lab or model directly.
Implications · machine-drafted, not owner judgment
This is the latest step in a multi-year arXiv crackdown (endorsement requirements, CS review-article bans, year-long slop bans), signaling AI-written-paper volume is now large enough to materially change how research gets published and vetted. For anyone citing arXiv preprints as a timeliness signal, moderation delays may grow for legitimate authors caught in the backlog.
- Whether rate limiting measurably slows CS-category submission growth by year-end
- Other preprint servers (bioRxiv, SSRN) adopting similar limits
Sources
- press arXiv Is Rate Limiting Submissions Because It Can't Keep up With AI Slop retrieved 2026-10-06